I enjoyed reading this article, and I would like to further understand what the authors intent was when he wrote it. Was the purpose of this article to expose how critical race theory curriculum in schools is implemented through the vehicle of a political correctness culture that values indoctrination of ethics over free speech. This environment creates a regime rather than safe space because it doesn’t allow transparency between stakeholders within school thereby canceling out other parties opinions. Don’t ask don’t tell isn’t always the best solution because it defaces the relevance of the human condition by cancellation of the other. In short objective transparency among parties is essential to humanize rather than objectify the other?
I enjoyed reading this article, and I would like to further understand what the authors intent was when he wrote it. Was the purpose of this article to expose how critical race theory curriculum in schools is implemented through the vehicle of a political correctness culture that values indoctrination of ethics over free speech. This environment creates a regime rather than safe space because it doesn’t allow transparency between stakeholders within school thereby canceling out other parties opinions. Don’t ask don’t tell isn’t always the best solution because it defaces the relevance of the human condition by cancellation of the other. In short objective transparency among parties is essential to humanize rather than objectify the other?